Category Archives: Uncategorized

Miss Anne Carson: A Web of Words

 

desire doubled is love and love doubled is madness

– from The Beauty of the Husband, p. 38[1]


 

One feels that Anna Carson is a Miss because of the precocious brilliance that she possesses, but actually Anne Carson is far from it, she is a Mrs, and indeed that is what The Beauty of the Husband is all about.

Many of my friends ‘discovered’ Anne Carson before me. In fact, I have to give credit to a friend urging me towards Autobiography of Red about two years ago, but I was not ready for it then. I am a firm believer that there are times when we can be, because of the stages of personal development that we then face, especially well-primed for a text. I am glad that, for example, I read Germaine Greer or someone like John Fowles as an adult. I think that in the case of the former, if I were a child, I would not understand the adult content of the book and in the case of the latter, the finely crafted texture of the prose would have been lost on me.  However, there are exceptions, the enduring appeal of a writer like Neil Gunn and the vernacular heave and sway of his prose style would be equally enchanting to a clever child as it is to an adult.

But I have praised Neil Gunn enough elsewhere. Now I want to think about Anne Carson. I borrowed a copy of The Beauty of the Husband from the English-language poetry section of the National Library of Iceland in Reykjavik. I took it away with me for my ‘final’ work camp in East Iceland, knowing that long novels and books were not well-suited to my very busy schedule.  I became quickly absorbed in the story – unusual for narrative poems, which I can often find difficult and unapproachable. The story was basically about the relationship between Carson and her husband. It was not a conventional relationship (which relationships ever are?), but a troubled, problematic, passionate and brilliant one. As Carson delineates the story of the love growing, ebbing, transforming, diminishing – much like an Elizabethan sonnet cycle – the reader is drawn into a privileged, dangerous, sensual world in which Carson and her husband play a very ‘high-level-game’ with language.

I remember once in Ghent watching a band of young jazz musicians. Their knowledge of the musical scores, instruments and indeed music as a whole was so far-reaching that at any given point they could trade instruments with each other and happily carry on. I saw the same thing in Húrra and Kex Café in Reykjavik. When I mentioned this to my friend Joachim, he smiled as though I were taking such wizardry for granted. Yes, but it is a very high level sort of game.

Couples tend to create worlds and then lose themselves there. It is called infatuation.  However, I am already old enough to know that the result of this kind of accelerated vortex of fascination is disastrous. Getting lost is never fun and even when you are two you can feel alone. Alone is a soft way of putting it, it’s more like being cut adrift on an ocean or being a castaway on an island: it’s absolute. So many of these worlds (highly secretive, ornate and private) simply disappear, fly off record like planets spinning off into other solar systems. But what Carson does in The Beauty of the Husband is capture the whole fluttering, temporary and fierce organism, for a moment on the page. I haven’t lost you yet, have I?

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Visiting Latraberg with Guthni

07.06.2015

The Cliffs of Latraberg: One of Icleand's Unmissable Sights

The Cliffs of Latraberg: One of Icleand’s Unmissable Sights

Yesterday we went on a day trip to Latraberg. I wasn’t sure what to expect as Guthni was driving us, and as good-natured as the man is, it is never easy to predict what will happen in the company of Guthni. As it turned out, he had a number of surprises lined up for us, and what I half-imagined would be a brief trip of one or two hours, turned out to be a whole day-long excursion.

In fact, one of the highlights of the trip was getting to know a little more about Guthni himself.  What was revealed between the bleated enunciation of words and syllables, multiple nods and ‘yahs’ and many valiant mutual attempts at communication was a kind of autobiography: a life story strung out between car stops and sights, between skerries, bays and fjord tips. 

Now that I think of it, Guthni must be one of the most ‘authentic’ Icelanders I have yet met in this country. I knew that he grew up in this region and that he lived for a year in Reykjavik before turning his back on it and returning to the homeland, even more resolved against the migration away from the countryside that was eroding the life he knew and had always known. He came back. He didn’t like it there. Of course, the moment Guthni told me about his brief sojourn to Reykjavik, two iconic characters from Icelandic films I had recently watched sprang to mind — firstly the ‘grump’ and secondly the wayward elderly pair who play the stars of Friðrik Þór Friðriksson’s Icelandic classic Börn Náttúrunnar [Children of Nature]. These strange and fantastical films, more composed of dream sequences and dark strains of satire than linearly directed or plausible narrative, are both about return. In both cases the lost prodigal children return to the Icelandic heartland — its wilderness — and renounce modern life as symbolised by Reykjavik’s culture of superficial yuppiedom. Reykjavik: a place where anarchist-comedian maverick Jon Gnarr served as major for four years beginning 2010! It’s ludicrous and brilliant. Where else but Reykjavik could this happen?  A place where what is kooky, weird and even perverse has taken roots and flourishes. But not in the Westfjords. The Westfjords is Texas — Texas with the Alps. Here people are still trying to hold onto something, some Icelandic essence. Not all of them are, most of them have already given up, but men like Guthni keep the flag flying.

Guthni is like a hero from a Steinbeck novel. Staring at his enormous hands on the steering wheel of the 4×4 pickup vehicle that he is constantly driving, I realised that these paw-like hands were at least three times bigger than mine. The man himself is tall and strong, with close-shaved hair and eyes that never seem to focus directly on you but probably see more than you know. He is old, but not old for an Icelandic grandfather – they have children here very young. But he must be in his late fifties or early sixties. Unlike most Icelandic people he cannot really speak English and when I first met him, because of his evasive body language I thought he was a shy man. Now I realise that I was wrong. On Sunday he was very eager to make conversation and I gradually unravelled, with the help of pointing and a car-piloted game of I-Spy, the story of Guthni’s life.

Breidavik

Breidavik

Guthni was born in the Westfjords in a very beautiful hidden beach at the foot of the Latraberg escarpment, not far from Breidavik, which, for those who don’t know it is a glorious crescent shaped bay of unusually golden sand, highly unique for Iceland. His father was the first in the family to come to the Westfjords and built himself a house there, right on the beach. Next he built himself a barn, then he built his sister a house. He was the light-housekeeper for the small lighthouse built on the cliff promontory and kept sheep.

The room where Guthni was born: upper storey of the house

The room where Guthni was born: upper storey of the house

Guthni’s father was clearly a very determined and strong man. In order to build a settlement large enough for his family on this very remote and forbidding stretch of coastline, he personally trucked over tree trunks bought from timber merchants, then sawed, lathed and set them. And all in one Icelandic summer. His workshop — the kind that would make any workman jealous — was a veritable Aladdin’s cave of handy-man treasure, studded with a mind-boggling assortments of tools and machinery. The vast teeth-edged saw bands used for bisecting the enormous trunks were still hanging high in the ceiling of the cavernous barn-turned-workshop. They looked like oversized film reels. So that’s how the old house on the mossy beach that Guthni was born in came into being: it was built from the foundations up by one man.

Guthnis' fathers workshop

Guthnis’ fathers workshop

Everyone comes from somewhere, everyone was born somewhere. Yet Guthni comes from Talknafjordur in the Westfjords in a way that few people can claim for themselves. He is a real ‘child of nature’, a mineral person, hewn from the same sable rock as the hills. He works as an odd-jobs man for the local mayor – that’s how he came to be looking after us — but his real trade is building houses. As we drove along to Latraberg on the small dirt road, he pointed out house after house to me that he had built himself. My son , he said, gesturing at one little house clad in corrugated iron. My mother, he said, pointing at another. Did you build them all? I asked wonderingly. He nodded and turned back to watch the road. So Guthni is a titanic man by anyone’s standards, what the Icelanders would call ‘an iron man’. I would not trust anyone so much as Guthni to get me out of a tricky spot, head a rescue operation, fix anything or drive a four by four along stretches of rocky beach or along icy roads. The extremities and difficult conditions assailing those who live on this remote peninsula-land every single winter, demand people like this to live here. They are survivors.

I want to leave you with an image. By late afternoon we had finally arrived at Latraberg — a cliff made famous by the guidebooks for the vast assortment of migratory and native bird species, especially puffins, that nest here. Heading out of the car and approaching a nearby spot at the cliff edge where a handful of other tourists and birdwatchers were already gathered, I crouched down. My vision darted beyond a fist of spongy moss and some small purple flowers, there nestling in one of the crannies of the cliff was a delightful, fluffy little puffin.

Lundi

Lundi

I almost couldn’t believe my eyes, I wanted to squeak or laugh but I remained silent, with my chest pressed up against the dewey turf. I watched the puffin for about five minutes, it was so close! And so deliciously strange: its zesty, orange beak, its cross-eyes, its sweet domed little head. I wanted to snatch it up and cuddle it.

Lundi: detail

Lundi: detail

Eventually I tore myself away to continue wandering along the cliffs and catch sight of the myriad other bird species that have a special preference for the austere, sheer and dramatic cliffs of Latraberg, especially nesting fulmars and guillemots. Just as I stood up I turned back to look behind me. There I saw, of all people, Guthni, grinning like a child, flat on his belly, observing the puffin. There was something amusing about seeing this beast of a man so clearly tickled and mollified by the sight of a creature that must be as familiar to him as pigeons are to us. Then I saw his slowly raise his hand and draw towards it. I am perhaps over-romanticising the moment: yet the power of this gesture struck me with particular force that day. I was like the spirit of old Iceland reaching out towards something, grasping into the mysteries of nature and the air itself. What was he reaching out towards? Was his inheritance there? Precious, unguarded, just within his grasp…

Later the symbol was explained. I was in the passenger seat and suddenly looked down at the gear stick beside Guthni who was driving. There I saw five or six large, mint-blue speckled eggs. I couldn’t believe it! Lundi? I asked, still full of astonishment. His eyes were merry and he cackled naughtily. Puffin eggs for tea!

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Track 09: People Will Say We’re in Love

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Track 07: Bewitched

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Track 03: Lullaby of Birdland

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

A Seaside Retreat in Winter

Only the magpie and I could have been capable of planning a trip to the seaside during the worst possible weather event of the year so far. However, I was dying to get out of Ghent and we were eager to take advantage of a weekend free of commitments. So we decided to go, come hail, rain and wind – or, as it turned out, all three.

Our destination was the small Flemish seaside resort town called Koksijder, where the magpie’s parents owned a small holiday apartment with a sea view that they usually rented out to visitors. I knew from my other excursion to the Flemish seaside – also precipitated by that desire to touch and reach out towards the outer limits of something, in Katzand – that it would not necessarily be the most picturesque experience. The Flemish coastline is notoriously built-up, with modern developments that are quickly snapped up by urban retirees or families belonging to Northern Belgium’s considerable middle-class. But somehow, having grown up in the UK, anticlimactic excursions to twee or insipid beach towns felt comfortingly familiar.

As I expected, the tram journey from De Panne – which veined its way along a succession of seaside towns – revealed not the open stretches of coastline that I had only half expected but a threaded-together seaside megatropolis. Quick flashing visions of grey sand and ravaged waters between buildings were the exception rather than the rule. But I didn’t mind, because I was with the magpie — even if there was something laughable about this off-season trip to the seaside and the deserted clothes shops lining empty town high streets or the casinos with doors bolted shut. We were in post-modern, post-defiled nature; in Bordieu’s America – a place where a landscape had been commoditised, exploited and finally, abandoned.

What was I really in search of? Loneliness, to be alone with him. Writing this makes me think of a wonderful passage that Jonathan Franzen pens down in the preface to his collection of essays How to Be Alone. There is a difference between loneliness and solitude he asseverates:

Readers and writers are united in their need for solitude, in their pursuit of substance in a time of ever-increasing evanescence: in their reach inward, via print, for a way out of loneliness.

However, I also just wanted to go on holiday, on holiday with Lukas to the seaside. The jolly silly optimism of this wish tickled me; it was childishly, simply true.

Literally translated Koksijder means ‘cuttlefish bay’. True to form, the beach beyond the windows of our apartment was abundantly strewn with the little white skeletons of long-dead fish. I remember the brittle crunch and crack of their shells beneath my boots and the soft, chalk-like texture of their internal armoury pressed beneath my finger-tips. On the first outing to the beach – once we had deposited the guitar and baggage in the apartment – we jumped across the capillary-system of small coastal burns that laced the seashore – infringing  beyond the boundaries of their wave-like brothers. I saw a forlorn star-like shape, waving crumpled arms in one of these illusive sand-coloured streams. A starfish! I cried. I picked it up. It stung me. We laughed. We collected shells, ate sandwiches on the sand dunes – did the normal things.

I was pleasantly surprised by his parent’s DVD collection. I explored it at leisure that evening. It was exactly the medley of precocious European cinema that I expected from such an educated couple. There was some documentaries on the history of the area – an area rich in history, as it turns out, largely due to its proximity to Dunkirk – whose strategic position on the coast between mainland Europe and Britain, had once determined the fate of a European war. Then there were some rom-coms – and then, Casanova by Fellini.

Since my apprenticeship to Italian neo-Realist cinema and the great Northern Italian cinematic auteur Pasolini in 2012, I had always loved Italian cinema. My favourite Fellini film had been Amarcord though La Strada had also touched me. But Casanova appealed to me at that time for a number of reasons:  it resonated with the romantic sub-text of the trip, but also because our delightful flatmate Artay, the part-time actor, had recently starred as lead in a modern interpretation of the film. Casanova it was.

Symbolised by the crowing of the mechanical cuckoo, the extended, lyrical passages of the film’s magic-surrealism, was what made it so memorable. This orgiastic optical brilliance was a wonderful example of cinematically reconciling form to content. I loved it all: the campness, Donald Sutherland’s British-dramatic bravura, its latent (though occasionally tenuous engagement with feminism), and the exaggerated costumes, which were, like the film itself, daring, unconventional and bizarre in the extreme. As the young, Neoplatonist Casanova fornicated with the virile urgency of a young buck – first a nun, then a cadaverous young girl prone to fainting, then a run-away beauty dressed as a young squire, Lukas sighed and yawned, we drank our wine, he fell asleep. I felt locked away, hidden in a secret place no one could ever find me. The gas fire twinkled, the black ocean beyond the French window churned in a frenzy of turbulent activity, two dog-walkers passed below on the street. The flag outside our window that quickly became my anemometer, was so tortured by the strength of opposing gales that it became almost still.

It can sometimes be the case, that a holiday or short trip nominally intended to be about discovering the ‘great outdoors’ or the history of an area, slowly but surely accepts its true fate, adjust its expectations and accepts a lesser version of itself. But here, for once, I was not ashamed about my decision to spend most of the weekend indoors. It was irresistible: while wind and rain ripped and tore along the coast, there we were, held on a magical island of inactivity, within the bounds of a semi-luxurious apartment, where time had no meaning at all.

I meant to write that weekend – of course I did not. Chicken was finished (my piece on Sickert) and I felt at leisure to track the magpie’s passions. So we learnt about gypsy jazz, I learned some barrier swing chords with a lot of flats and minors and we both learnt about the basic concept of rhythm guitar and the crucial role played by la pompe. The pumper, the water pumper, the rhythm-pumper. Lukas also introduced me to some great manouche legends. All in all it was a weekend of grand musical education which extended beyond just the guitar. Lukas showed me some wonderful clips of the great female British-American jazz icon Marian McPartland playing honky tonk in a string of pearls, looking to all intents and purposes as prim as a member of the royal family. We disagreed about Bill Evans, I liked his  philsophy of ‘displacement’ and the many-petalled contusions (Lukas didn’t);. we agreed about Horace Silver… I was learning, the magpie was showering months of hard-earned jazz knowledge onto me for want of a better audience, and it all slowly slipped in between smoked-salmon sandwiches, glasses of red wine and the strange assortment of herbal teas I found in the parental tea closet.

Eventually we did make it to Dunkirk – just in case you were wondering. We were so close to the French border that it would have been a pity not to. The original plan was to walk from Belgium to France and back again, but then, given the inclement weather, and the sudden, violent downpours of rain and hail, we opted for the chat with a gregarious French bus-driver instead. The French coast was far more beautiful than the Flemish: more dishevelled, less developed, more forgiving in general. But then I knew it would be. Imagine Brighton Rock without the rock and moules frites instead. Then Dunkirk: a friendly brasserie, a broken umbrella, some historic boats moored in a harbour; the yellowing, stunted grass beside the walkway to the sea. That was all we had time for.

All in all not a big-deal weekend – perhaps nothing to speak of; just the kind of average thing that couples do. Except we were not a couple, and never would be. We were friends, lovers, fellow musicians, sometimes – why not be honest? – enemies. But for those few days the only tempests that raged were the ones outside. Inside, next to the fire, behind the window, before the screen, after the dinner we were disciples in search of the same thing: company in solitude.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Track 2: Paper Moon

Leave a comment

Filed under Moments Musicaux, Uncategorized

Artay: The Modern-Day Aphorist

By now you all know the magpie: his presence looms large over my life here; as a kind of omega, someone that organises me and disperses me, someone I cannot help love. But there are many other characters that have some stake in my life in Ghent. There is of course Alexandro – the geologist – a good friend and councilor, housemates like Artay and his girlfriend Dinah, whom I live with, as well as work friends, and more recently Danilo – a devilishly clever, Machiavellian type from Argentina. For Danilo everything is reducible to a question of motivation and desire; but thankfully he is easier to engage with than Lacan (though probably more difficult than Jung). In any case he is certainly most welcome food for the brain after I have run the numbing endurance test of work at the pub.

In the ramshackle house that I have come to call home we make quite a cobbled-together, modern family grouping that many of you will recognise from the post-university fallout. The magpie and I, Dinah, Artay and our house dog, the golden retriever Sparky (also known as Barky). We try our best to keep on top of domestic chores but in reality it is a constant battle against domestic entropy, as we are all (perhaps with the exception of Dinah who has Protestant-Germanic roots) inherently untidy people. In general, that’s how I like it; spaces should be free and natural and not coercively arranged. We unfold, we express and generally everyone is very happy, especially since the kitchen juicer has appeared.

But let me clear some space on the table now and move the musty wine glasses to one side. I want to write some more about Artay, because he is quite an exceptional person, whose wisdom has done much to shape and colour my experience of this city.

I call Artay a modern-day aphorist. Why should that be? Because Artay, more than anyone I have ever known has a habit of formulating pithy, concise statements of moral and social truth that have epigrammatic power .  As a professional boxer who has experienced many sides of life and lived all over the world, someone who knows people of all social levels and once told me that there is nothing that he has not tried; I have more faith in his feelings about the universe than most. And he is also an actor – an artist, one who realises the potency that words can carry and is prepared to see and say the things that others fear to. What is the nature of the truths that he points out to me? There are not always benign. I remember him once speaking of a lesson that he gleaned from watching a drama-documentary about the Vikings. The lesson was this: often if you speak out too soon about the things that you wish, you will never obtain them. It is better to conceal these desires and let the stream take you to where you want to be. Only when you are in the right position to act should you do so –  not before.

Many of his lessons and beliefs about life have a fablesque, maxim-like force. They are also often premised on one of his favourite activities – boxing – and thus are often framed in martial terms, or at least make use of it in a metaphorical way. One of the most memorable things he said to me, he learnt in the ring. What was it? That to be big, you must first be small. Why? Because if you are big you are an easier target, if you are small you are harder to attack. Another memorable aphorism: we were discussing the Adam and Eve myth. It prompted this reflection from him: It is strange, when you think about it, that it was the apple that Eve ate and that is mentioned in the Bible. It is not a very sweet or rich fruit. It could have been a peach or a pear. An apple is not so appealing. So why did Eve take it? There can only be one real reason: because it was forbidden, and only because it was forbidden by God. It is amazing that humankind are so attracted to what is forbidden, and only because it is.

Whenever Artay feels like sharing his feelings about life my ears are always open. Thus, when one afternoon, I climbed the stairs to his attic-room in need of a chat and some advice, I was very receptive to his words. Often his teachings go against many of the ‘liberal’, romantic or humanist values I have been raised on, but for that reason they are very interesting to hear. That day we spoke extensively about love. Artay imparted some of his knowledge to me about mankind. He said, it is a sad and amazing thing but often when you give ten, the people give you back one. To illustrate his example he spoke of a group of acquaintances he met at a socialist club. As a friendly, open gesture, when someone asked him for a cigarette, his threw his whole packet down on the table. Take what you want and need, he said to them. He thought no more of it. But later, much later, one of those people brought up this incident with him. Why did you throw your cigarettes on the table like that? There was something in this gesture that repulsed them, that incurred their contempt or suspicion. It was too much. They started questioning his motivations. Ergo, he gave ten out of the goodness of his heart, his return? One. But, he said later, it is amazing and counter-intuitive that often, when you give people one, they give you back ten. Your indifference or detachment excites their interest.

I don’t generally have much time for psychological game-playing. It is cynical and not my thing. But neither does Artay – it was merely his observation – he observes human nature. Perhaps he is right.  However, later, in a more benign frame of mind, he offered to translate a paragraph that his friend – an Iranian poet- has sent to him on the internet.

It was originally in Farsi, but his translation was so beautiful, that afterwards I asked him to repeat it and rushed to write it down.

Here is it, a secular, modern-day sermon. Artay’s advice:

“If we see someone is angry we should know that he needs some touching and kind words. If somebody is disappointed & hopeless he needs to be appreciated. If someone is jealous he needs to be seen. If somebody complains he needs to be heard and if somebody is bitter he needs to receive kindness. And if someone oppresses then he needs someone to love him. If somebody is greedy then he needs to be forgiven. And all of these shadows in our spirit & in our heart need love to fall on them like rain falling & falling & falling…”

Leave a comment

Filed under Reportage, Uncategorized

Track 01: Loverman

Leave a comment

Filed under Moments Musicaux, Uncategorized

Time Passes: Moments Musicaux at Zilverhof

As Christmas and an impending visit to family and friends in London drew near, my mind fell upon a new plan. It came to me during a day dream in Dutch class, at the House of the Netherlands on Congostraat. What could I prepare for my dad that would please him at a low budget, yet satiate my desire to be creative? Then I had it: make him a CD, an album of the jazz standards that Lukas and I had been informally running through at Zilverhof for months. I could see this mini-Christmas project as something that would perform dual functions: alleviating the pressure of buying presents and giving us both a sense of creative direction and focus.

The next five or six days passed by in a flurry of activity. It was over the weekend, so naturally I was very busy with work at the pub, but now I was also in official recording cahoots with Lukas, who had instantly taken to the Christmas gift idea after sacking off one of his guitar buddies.

“Irreconcilable artistic differences,” he informed me.

It seemed that Lukas’s music partner had insulted him in a moment of drink-fuelled honesty.

“I cannot play with someone who doesn’t like my music,” said Lukas to me afterwards, severely wounded.

So it was really more of a mutual sacking-off. Anyway, the conflict made Lukas endorse my own musical project with renewed relish and excitement.

“How long have we got?” he asked.

“Four days tops.”

“How many songs?”

“I think a full album – ten with piano and vocals, two as piano solos.”

Lukas almost fell off his stool with laughter.

“You think that recording is that easy? It can take months to do a proper recording of a song!” he replied.

“Well, I’m not after perfection in jazz, just something that will warm my father’s heart from time to time.”

I had no pride to defend. I knew I was completely inexperienced and that he was the ‘musician’, and I also realised that he was probably selling himself short by agreeing to work with me. But sometimes artistic stuffiness gets in the way of so much real progress. Maybe sometimes projects need amateurs to push them along into realisation. In any case, the process was set in motion that Friday afternoon.

We began work straight away, recording some of those jazz standards that we believed worked best. Which ones were they? Well ‘Can’t Help Loving Dat Man’ done up-tempo or ‘honky tonk style’ as Lukas always says, ‘My Romance’ and ‘People Will Say We’re In Love’. I was surprised to see some of these songs in our jazz anthology (loaned to us courtesy of the magnificent Ghent public library): I was familiar with them from the great Roger & Hammerstein musicals such as Show Boat and Oklahoma, that I watched with obsessive interest as a little girl. But in any case, they instantly magnetized me; they were melodies that I knew as instinctively as primary school hymns. Then there were also the more difficult ones, the elusive, broken discordancies of ‘But Beautiful’ with its tapping insistence on B flat, and then others — more ‘bluesy’ numbers that required a bit of vocal sass, such as ‘Is You Is or Is You Aint my Baby?’

It was a marvellous experience. Often, the best recording moments were in the early hours of the morning when I returned home from my night-shift. Then we would sit, penny a piece, in Lukas’ dank, messy room, knotted and overcrossed with wires and cables – I with my black waitressing apron tied in a ribbon round my waist, and he at the piano; bow-backed, beautiful.

It was during those nocturnal sessions, snatched between shifts and ‘good’ as opposed to ‘bad’ voice moments, that I realised how rewarding the collaborative and highly demanding work of recording music together really is. I mean, I had been recorded before – I had done it informally myself on a dictaphone with my piano teacher, and for school projects, but I had never done it with a computer programme and a microphone and one of the most brilliant jazz pianists in Belgium. Lukas was also in his element – the beautiful piano solos, intros and outros he carved out of the air in moments, his inherent ability to spot what key I should sing in – the sessions muscled out in him, what I already knew to exist but had lain dormant beforehand, that Lukas was a producer and musician of the highest possible calibre.

The strange and illuminating process of trying to capture that  elusive ‘wrap’ number was also of great educational value to me. What was it, we both wondered and questioned together, that conspired to make one recording mediocre or another definitive? How could you harness the ‘magic’ — as we began to call it – trying to identify a quality that evades easy definition with words. Sometimes we found that it was grinding re-rehearsal that produced what we were looking for, at other times true teamwork, feedback and assessment, constructive criticism from listening to previous recordings. These felt like familiar tag-lines from teaching. However, ultimately more often than not the final cinch numbers came about mysteriously and unpredictably.

It was that weekend that I realised what an intimate, probing test and experience recording is for the vocalist. The mic, poised before your salivated mouth, captures everything: every false intonation, every flat note and hesitation. To achieve great recording requires mastery over your instrument but it also requires a deep degree of control over yourself, and feeling, a feeling for the beauty and pathos of the songs that you are singing. The mic can capture belief. It was astounding. Those recording sessions were some of the most profoundly honest self-encounters I had had for years, and more profound because they were witnessed by another. So great recording is about honesty, self-knowledge and also about trust. I realise now that those recording sessions with Lukas were also an act of love: they were nourished, enriched, ‘produced’ and structured by a feeling we shared between us.

And the result? Of course they were not all ‘great’. But some of them weren’t bad at all, considering that I am not a professional singer or even, really a talented enthusiast. Plus, those bitterly cold nights and comradely feelings of shared purpose and achievement also furnished me with another important realisation. The production of art should be collaborative. If for music, why not for writing? My experiences recording with Lukas, tapping out blues rhythms and debating about keys and tonal harmonies made me realise that great art should not only be encountered and received socially – but should be produced, as part of a more general benediction and grace, socially – in commune with another. In Campo Santo W.G. Sebald writes that “we make music to defend ourselves against being overwhelmed by the terrors of reality.” This seems to me a rather cynical point of view. Perhaps sometimes music is defensive or escapist, perhaps all art is; but it is also enriching – it works towards eliminating and palliating some of the very ‘terrors’ that we do see in life.

Leave a comment

Filed under Reportage, Uncategorized